All of the points that were once in the right-hand side of the rectangular graph are now somewhere inside or on the boundary of that circle. The infinity points of all three join together at the right of the chart. Viewed from the side, you see a circle created from the two reactance axes, bisected by the resistance axis. Distorting or mapping the rectangular coordinate graph by bending the Y axis toward the positive X axis captures all of its right-hand side impedances inside the circle formed by the bent reactance axes. This process is sketched in Figure 2.įIGURE 2. The negative resistance axis still extends behind you, as straight as ever. Do the same for the negative reactance axis, bending it up instead. Now imagine reaching up over your head and bending the positive reactance axis down in front of you (make your favorite bending noise) in a semicircle whose far end meets up with the far end of the positive resistance axis. The positive reactance axis starts at your feet and goes straight up and the negative straight down. What is this magic mapping? Imagine yourself standing on the origin of the rectangular graph with the positive resistance axis in front of you and the negative behind. (βl gives the electrical position along the line.) What Smith discovered, however, was that if you distort the rectangular graph in a certain way (called a mapping), the path of Z along the line becomes a circle on the distorted graph. Z = Z O Īnd the path it describes on a rectangular graph does not lend itself to easy use. The equation describing how that impedance point moves around on a graph of rectangular coordinates is pretty intimidating:
That means the point on the graph of resistance and reactance also moves around with position in the line, returning to its original position every half-wavelength (1/2λ) as it turns out. For example, if the equivalent impedance looks like 5Ω of resistance and +20Ω of reactance at one point, a bit farther along the line the equivalent impedance might be 20Ω of resistance and -5Ω of reactance. This results in different combinations of incident and reflected voltages and currents and their equivalent impedance. The voltages and currents of both waves also vary with distance along the line because of the AC nature of the waves. If you cut the line at that point and replace the section beyond the cut with actual components of the equivalent impedance, there would be no change to the waves in the remaining section of the line! It is as if the same energy in the line had been applied to an impedance with values of resistance and reactance that create the same phase relationship. At each point, the combination results in voltage and current with a phase relationship different from either the incident or reflected waves. The incident and reflected voltage and current waves combine at every point along the line. The phase of the voltage and currents making up the reflected wave will differ from those in the incoming or incident wave depending on the value of the impedance causing the reflection. In a transmission line, when a wave of RF voltage and current encounters an impedance different from the characteristic impedance of the transmission line, Z 0, some of the energy in the wave is reflected back towards the wave’s source. R and X are the rectangular coordinates of the impedance. The vertical axis represents reactance (X): positive (inductive) above the origin and negative (capacitive) below.
The horizontal axis represents resistance (R): positive to the right of the origin and negative to the left. Positive resistance which represents loss is on the positive X axis. Inductive reactance is positive (+Y axis) and capacitive reactance is negative (-Y axis). The X axis represents resistance (R) and the Y axis represents reactance (X). This graph shows the rectangular coordinates for any impedance. Graphically, these components are represented as a pair of axes at right angles, as in Figure 1.įIGURE 1. All impedances consist of resistance and reactance. The ARRL has made the QST articles available for downloading at Where Does the Smith Chart Come From?īefore discussing the chart, let’s back up a step. You can read these articles first or use them as references throughout this article. They provide as much background as you care to absorb, and deeper discussions than this article can provide. First described by Phillip Smith in 1939, there are a number of QST articles and a detailed Wikipedia page ( en./wiki/Smith_chart) on the Smith Chart.